I almost made a grown man cry today

tygermama:

princess-oliver-jonas:

at work I called out his coffee order and he was like “that’s not how women usually call out my name 😉 😉 ;)” so I just blinked and said “I’ll try to sound more disappointed next time then” then walked away

oh my god, you goddess

Animal Intelligence

tinysaurus-rex:

pom-seedss:

karalora:

Ever notice how they keep moving the goalposts when it comes to animal intelligence vs. human intelligence?

“Humans are completely unique. No other animal uses tools.”

“Actually, wild sea otters have been observed using rocks to open shellfish.”

“Okay, but that’s not true intelligence. They just pick the rocks up; they don’t alter them in any way.”

“Chimps peel the leaves from sticks to make more effective termite probes.”

“Well, that’s just technology. Only humans have art.”

“What about painting elephants? Art critics often can’t tell the difference between their work and a human’s.”

“Okay fine. But only humans have language. That’s the mark of true intelligence.”

“These African Grey Parrots use hundreds of words correctly and even ask original questions.”

“Oh yeah? Well, does any non-human species demonstrate self-awareness?”

“Dolphins pass the mirror test without training.”

“Pfft. How about problem-solving?”

“I can’t keep squirrels out of my bird feeder no matter what I do.”

“Aha! Bet you can’t think of a species that possesses all these traits! Only humans! We’re No. 1! We’re No. 1!”

“Crows.”

“LALALALALA I CAN’T HEAR YOOOOUUUUUUUUU…”

Are we smart enough to know how smart animals are? by Frans de Waal explores this exact question and its a fascinating read.

The average pigeon is better at math than the average college student! 🙂

Edit: forgot to mention that while pigeons don’t create their own art without training, they recognize different art styles better than humans and have a preference as far as art goes!

impuretale:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

animentality:

laughterkey:

makeitearlgrey:

baldymonster:

cleolinda:

killjoyfeminist:

annabellioncourt:

plz-no:

Simultaneously the worst and best movie ever made

Actually one of my teachers watched every single version of Romeo and Juliet with the original text in front of him to prove that this was the worst version, but to his great dismay its the most accurate film adaptation of it, with the lines closest to the original text and most similar stage direction and relayed emotions.

He proceeded to show it to us in class.

Dude, seriously.  This version is actually very accurate.

My Shakespeare professor in grad school said the same thing.

I think most Shakespeare movies are just so classy and highbrow with their gorgeous period costumes and mandatory snooty elocutionary accents that people forget how goofy this play actually is. The lines, the characters, the motivations, the babyfaced teen stars, I just… oh my god it’s all so real. I’ve heard a lot of people blast Baz Luhrmann for making such a campy adaptation and it’s just like no, you don’t understand, that was all Shakespeare.

Sometimes I wonder if the real reason it’s disliked is because it was so damn popular with teenage girls.

You mean… Like the actual play?

THE BOYS THE BOYS

So you’re saying Shakespeare would have approved.

THE MOST ACCURATE ADAPTATION OF SHAKESPEARE’S WORK THERE HAS EVER BEEN

If Shakespeare had been given cameras instead of just a stage, this is absolutely the movie he would have made. 

cellarspider:

castielwinchestqueer:

arctickayla:

tkushes:

rhabdomancer:

tkushes:

never seen awful statues?? I think u are forgetting all of Michelangelo’s attempts at sculpting women, the big queer

Damn, how could I forget?

image

Dented oranges are my favorite type of breast

Michel-I’ve never seen a naked woman-angelo 

he literally just sculpted a man’s pectorals and put lumpy lemons on them

Okay to be fair, there are a shitton of Virgin Mary paintings that show Mickey wasn’t the only dude out there doing religious art who hadn’t a fucking clue what breasts were supposed to be.

Madonna Nursing the Christ Child, Robert Champin’s (c. 1375 – 26 April 1444)   workshop. Tiny shoulderboobs will be a theme here, as will babies who look like they want to start a fight.

Madonna With Child, Rogier van der Weyden, c.1450. Please note that we have both tiny boob and an invisible nipple.

Mary and Child, Gerard David (1490). Even the baby isn’t buying it.

Madonna Nursing the Christ Child, Legend of the Master of the Magdalen (15th-16th century)

Galaktotrophousa, Master Ioannis (1778). Yes, there’s a boob in this picture.

And my favorite, for bonus points of “why is this even a thing”:

The Miraculous Lactation of St. Bernard, Alonso Cano (1650)

This painting depicts the spiritual nourishing of St. Bernard by the milk of Our Lady, based on this legendary mystical experience: Bernard prayed before a statue of the Madonna, asking her, “Show yourself a mother” (“Monstra te esse Matrem”). The statue came to life and and squirted milk from the breast onto the Saint’s lips.

So yeah, Michelangelo couldn’t sculpt a boob to save his goddamn life, but if he was cribbing off of other artists, he can be forgiven. At least one of them might have seen a boob and still fucked up this bad.

gallusrostromegalus:

the-scarlet-spider:

braincoins:

freshfriedtrash:

skazuhira-miller:

glenjamin-danzig:

who was the fool who was tasked with naming the galaxy and the only adjective they could think of was ‘mmmmmmmmmmmmilky…’

scientist: (gazing up at space) 
scientist: ……….. it sure is a milky boy 

NO

YOU DONT UNDERSTAND

ASTRONOMERS ARE THE SHITTIEST EVER AT NAMING THINGS I KID YOU NOT.

When it came time to name the two theoretical particle types that might be dark matter THEY INTENTIONALLY CHOSE THE NAMES SO THAT THE ACRONYMS WOULD SPELL “WIMPS” AND “MACHOS” I SHIT YOU NOT

THEY ARE FUCKING TERRIBLE AT NAMING ANYTHING

I just listened to a talk by Neil deGrasse Tyson himself LAST NIGHT and he went on about this more than once.

“I’m walking down the street and I’m like ‘ooh pretty rock…’ and some Geologist is like ‘actually, that’s anorthosite feldspar’ and I’m like ‘Nevermind, I don’t want it anymore.’ Any biologists in the audience? [some clapping] Yeah, you know what I’m talking about. The most important molecule in the human body, what did you name it? It has NINE SYLLABLES and it’s so long that even YOU GUYS abbreviate it as ‘DNA’!

But astrophysicists and astronomers? No, man, we call it like we see it. Star made of neutrons? NEUTRON STAR. Small white star? WHITE DWARF. You know that big red spot on Jupiter? Know what we called it? JUPITER’S RED SPOT.”

okay i’m glad you mentioned the biologist nonsense bc their naming methods are the bane of my existence

I see your astrophysicists-are-shit-at-names and raise you Marine-Biologists-Are-Fucking-Maniacs.

See this beautiful creature?

It’s a carnivorous deep-sea sponge that lives off of Easter Island and never sees the light of day, as it’s about 9000 feet down. Those delicate-looking orbs are covered in millions of tiny hooked spines, which latch onto anything unfortunate enough to bump into it, and hold it in place as it is digested alive by the sponge’s skin.  Amazing, beautiful and profoundly creepy.  They could have given it so many cool names.  Could have drawn on mythology (I think Scylla would have been an appropriate reference), the region it was found in, the textured skin, PHAGOCYTOSIS, anything!  

You wanna know what they called it?

PING-PONG TREE SPONGE.

Good job, marine biologists.

New Sitcom Idea

dxrk-sxxls:

billykaplxn:

llewellyenanchaisleaindubh:

billykaplxn:

billykaplxn:

A lesbian couple gets a shocking surprise one day when God (played by Laverne Cox) shows up at their door. Upset at how humans had turned her message of love and acceptance into a message of hate and discrimination, she decides it’s time to send Jesus back to earth and wants the lesbian couple to raise Jesus. Hilarity ensues.

No need for homophobic or transphobic jokes when you can have exchanges like
“Ma’am your son turned the water fountain into wine again and got all the other students drunk”
“Jesus Christ.”
“….. I’m not sure if that’s suppose to be you responding to me or you requesting to speak to him.”

Also jokes about infinity-“Ask your mom”.

Kid: “Mom, can I sleep over at John’s place?”

Mom #1: “Oh, I don’t know, sweetie. Ask your mom.”

Kid: “Mom, can I sleep over at John’s?”

Mom #2: “I don’t know, have you asked your mom already?”

Kid praying: “Mom, can I sleep over at John’s place?”

God: “Have you asked your moms already?”

OH MY GOD YALL ARE KILLING IT

Title: Jesus, Mary & Josephine

sevdrag:

wrench-wench:

soryualeksi:

green-tea-and-baby-carrots:

lycanthropuns:

icanhelpyouthere:

icanhelpyouthere:

Headcanon that McGonagall is offended on a personal level that Umbridge loves cats. 

This literally got 600 more notes just while I was at dinner what the fuck

How has nobody thought about this before tbh

Ok but imagine McGonagall in cat form prowling around the castle, in strategically chosen places so that Umbridge will come across her. 

Umbridge takes the cat back to her office and feeds it a little saucer of milk. The cat starts coming back to Umbridge’s office around the same time every night, until eventually Umbridge gets into a little routine of setting out a saucer of milk for the cat before bed. 

McGonagall now has all the best secrets on Umbridge, all of the results of the evaluations, and most importantly, is in a perfect position to spy on the ministry for the Order of the Phoenix. 

All because Umbridge is obsessed with cats.

The mental image McGonagall lapping up that milk while full of burning hatred for Umbridge amuses me in ways I can hardly describe.

IT ME