I’m really interested in Joan’s wardrobe changes over the past two seasons – during seasons 1-3, her costuming was very casual and very feminine – lots of loose, open, blouses, lots of flowy skirts and dresses, and soft, drap-ey cardigans. Even her autumn/winter wear followed the same style, there were few episodes where she’d swap skirts for jeans, usually she just layered up with tights Like A Champ. In any case, her clothes very clearly broadcasts her as a civilian, not an officer of the law; it’s not meant to clearly identify her as someone who works with police.
[IMAGE: Three caps of Joan Watson’s outfits from seasons 1, 2 and 3. 1)
Joan wearing
a dark blue cotton top and ruffled black leather skirt. 2)
Joan wearing
a ruffled grey dress, tights, black ankle boots and beige overcoat 3) Joan wearing a grey cardigan, ruffled black skirt and purple blouse]
Starting from s4, however, Joan’s clothes have been more formal. We see a lot more suits, or suit-like attire – slacks, collared shirts, blazers, ties and bowties – and unlike her previous costumes, they’re also tend to be more fitted. They’ve growing steadily more white-collar office chic, but still not plain enough for official Law Enforcement attire – she’s wearing more masculine clothing like short ties, short sleeves and bows/bow ties, but they’re obviously less casual than her clothes for previous seasons.
[IMAGE: three screencaps of Joan Watson’s outfits from season 4. 1) Joan in a black dress with soft fabric bow and black coat. 2) Joan wearing black slacks and short-sleeved white shirt with a short. tie 3) Joan wearing white wide-legged slacks and black shirt with long bow at the front]
But most importantly, starting from season 5, her attire is less ‘civilian consultant chic’ and more reminiscent of the outfit of an FBI agent.
Take her at the crime scenes in 5.01 and 5.04, for example: she doesn’t look at all out of place at the scene, and if she started commanding forensics and taking the lead, you bet people would listen.
[IMAGE: Joan and Sherlock at a crime scene in a park in 5.01. Joan is wearing a light blue, short-sleeved collared shirt with a tie]
[IMAGE: Joan and Sherlock at a crime scene in an apartment 5.04. Joan is wearing black slacks and buttoned-up black blazer with a
black/pink
pattered shirt underneath]
They’re not the only thing she wears, but they’ve made a lot more appearances and I’d wager that they make up at least half of her outfits in season 5 so far.
I wonder if it’s to broadcast the message that she’s so much more confident in her work as a detective – by the start of season 4, she’s done a solo stint as a PI, had numerous clients, worked with the FBI and helped close a major organised crime case – or if it’s to broadcast to others law enforcement that she’s deserving of her place at the crime scene.
I’m gonna need to double check, but I think she wears a lot of the more “formal outfits” (collared shirts with ties and slacks) when she’s visiting the crime scene or going to the precinct, but not when she’s going round to interview/question persons of interest – there we see pattered shirts, skirts, shorts and so on.
Which is another interesting point – for one, both her and Sherlock have been put under question and scrutiny, so her dressing to conform to the dress code of law enforcement makes sense. But on another note, people tend to close up around the police, so Joan dressed in less formal clothing when going around to do questioning could be her using her position to her advantage. She’s officially a civilian, and so she could definitely use that to catch people off guard.
I’ve seen Elementary fans claiming their Sherlock is better than Sherlock’s because ours is an asshole and theirs is ‘sympathetic’ and ‘kind’.
I have nothing against Elementary, but may I just remind you – Sherlock is an asshole, because Sherlock is canonically an asshole. He was described as being cold, dispassionate and arrogant – not kind.
oh dear.
From ‘The Adventure of the Three Garridebs’, when Watson is shot: “For the first time, I had a glimpse of a great heart as well as a great brain.”
From ‘The Adventure of the Six Napoleons’, when Lestrade pays Holmes a sincere and heartfelt compliment : “And as he turned away, it seemed he was more nearly moved by the softer human emotions than I had ever seen him.”
From ‘The Problem of Thor Bridge’, when a rich client explains how he tried to seduce his children’s governess: “this young lady was in a sense under your protection…you have tried to ruin a defenseless girl who was under your roof. Some of you rich men have to be taught that all the world cannot be bribed into condoning your offenses.”
From ‘The Adventure of the Veiled Lodger’, after hearing the tragic story of a woman whose face was mauled by a lion; “Then Holmes stretched out his long arm and patted her hand with such a show of sympathy as I had seldom known him to exhibit, ‘Poor girl!’ he said, ‘Poor girl! The ways of fate are indeed hard to understand. If there is not some compensation hereafter, then the world is a cruel jest’ ”
From ‘The Adventure of the Speckled Band’, when speaking with a client whose father is physically abusive: “Five little livid spots, the marks of four fingers and a thumb, were printed upon the white wrist. ‘You have been cruelly used,’ said Holmes.”
Also, in “The Adventure of Abbey Grange,” he helps a young man escape, who intervened to prevent an alcoholic aristocrat from beating his wife.
In “The Adventure of the Second Stain”, Holmes goes out of his way to shield Lady Hilda from her husband’s anger, even though the husband was Holmes’ client.
In “The Adventure of the Blue Carbuncle” he lets a pathetic petty criminal go free because he doesn’t think making him a ‘jailbird’ will help.
There are many other instances of Holmes showing kindness, empathy and even breaking the law to help people gain justice.
Other phrases and words Watson uses to describe Holmes at various times:
“quiet, genial.”
“without a harshness, which was foreign to his nature.”
“he had a remarkable gentleness and courtesy in his dealings with women.”
Holmes may have displayed a certain impatience for social affectation, but he maintains a strong moral compass and asserts this fact several times, in various situations, towards various people.
This idea that Holmes is a “sociopathic” asshole is quite a contemporary reading and, might I add, a lazy one that’s as ignorant of mental illness as it is offensive to those of us who’re tired of white men getting to stomp all over people in the name of ‘genius’ and ‘anti-hero’ status. BBC Sherlock’s reading of Holmes is one that’s built on popular cultural tropes, and succeeds because of it. ‘Elementary’ reads Holmes with a fuller attention to the complexities of his character.
Anytime someone says ‘well Holmes is an asshole’ as a conclusive fact, I know that your canon knowledge is either limited or deliberately misinterpreted.
Do some re-reading.
The reason why I plump for Elementary over Sherlock is the fact that Elementary puts Sherlock’s occasional bouts of assholery in context.
And more importantly, they make him face the consequences of his assholery.
Sherlock in the original stories is actually yes, kind of strange in terms of how other people find it hard to follow his trains of thought. But the stories ALSO go out of their way to show you how he stands up for the victims. Not necessarily his clients – THE VICTIMS of crimes and shenanigans. Sherlock is on the side of the mistreated woman and the duped young employee. He is on the side of the man who is just trying to make a living for himself and for his wife. He is on the side of the people upon whom various injustices are perpetrated.
I hate this image of Sherlock being a genius AND an interminable terrifying fuckup of an asshole with an overbearing manner.
That’s not him.
Sherlock in the stories is polite and he actually knows how to interact with people like Watson as well as Mary. (I might as well address that.) Imagine a story where Sherlock suddenly turns up at Watson’s practice and ASKS – asks! Politely! – if Watson has time to work with him on a case. He tells Watson very explicitly that it is Watson who helps him to clarify some of his thoughts. He deeply appreciates his friends – and in the stories he does have friends.
Sherlock Holmes is not an unmitigated asshole, jeez.
I admit, I’ve been talking about this exact topic for awhile.
I hate to make an already long post even longer but this is really important not just in the sense of ‘canon’ and ‘characterization’ but in genre and in the idea that Sherlock Holmes is the most adapted character in the world.
Like, he is. He’s been adapted and re-adapted and re-re adapted in basically every decade.
So we have to ask questions about what purpose his original form served, who it served, who liked it, and why. And definitely it’s not perfect by today’s standards, and there are many points in it we’d see as less charming nowadays.
But we gotta ask what point is an adaptation in our modern world making? What interpretation of the character would serve the same purpose or needs as the original, in our new context and new environment? These stories were largely an adventure/’fantasy’ mystery series about a brilliant hero.
Whose needs does the ‘unmitigated asshole’ approach serve?
Whose needs does the ‘unmitigated asshole’ approach serve?